我们发现了什么
PapeMati98/Ai-Stack。多模型 AI 智能体技术栈:一个模型负责构建,模型谱系中的另一个模型负责审查。
- 来源:GitHub(发现于 2026-11-02)
- 证据等级:C · 存在定价或订阅线索;有收费设计不等于已有收入。
- 商业模式:待核验
- 主题:独立产品
- 初筛评分:13.4/100 · 收录 1 次
证据,比故事更重要。
规则清洗与初筛,未经人工商业核验。原文语境、实际客户和付费情况仍需自行验证。
引用与数字披露
来源类型(原作者自述/第三方测算/媒体转引)需采集端标注,本版尚未落字段。
- 作者
- 未标注
- 抓取日期
- 来源类型
- 未标注
- 币种
- 未标注
- 口径
- 未标注
- 披露主体
- 未标注
- 披露日期
- 未标注
中文辅助译文(全文)
AI Stack
一个模型负责构建,另一个模型负责审查。不会仅凭单一模型的判断就交付。
一个多模型智能体技术栈,将你已经付费使用的编程 CLI—— Claude Code、Codex、Gemini(Antigravity)、Grok、Kimi、Qwen、Mistral、OpenCode、 本地模型等——作为一支团队来运行,并提供任务图、60+ 项技能、 智能体间消息传递和共享记忆。
 图注:许可证为 Apache-2.0。  图注:技能数量为 60+。  图注:CLI 适配器数量为 13。  图注:安全策略。
来自 Synaptivo 团队。
为什么需要它
单智能体编程工具会给自己批改作业。AI Stack 绝不会这样做:
- 默认采用跨模型家族审查。 每项任务都由来自不同模型家族的 执行者/审查者配对完成(例如由 Claude 构建,由 Gemini 或 Grok 审查)。 审查失败会触发针对性修复,而不是重写。 - 使用你的订阅,而非意外 API 账单。 原生 Fleet 使用官方 CLI 自身的认证机制,以无头模式驱动它们,并验证实际作答的模型, 且绝不会在不作说明的情况下回退到按量付费。 - 用于真正并行工作的任务图。 小型任务使用一对执行者/审查者; 大型任务则作为依赖图运行,每个节点都有独立审查者。 - 可彼此通信的智能体。 Agent Office 是一个本地持久消息总线, 具备状态感知,并支持不同工具会话之间的交接。 - 共享记忆。 Knowledge Hub 是一个基于信源的 wiki;每个智能体 都会在开始工作前读取它,并在工作后向其写入记录。 - 会报告自身缺陷的技术栈。 RSI Helpdesk 允许智能体针对技术栈本身 提交缺陷,并执行范围受限且经过审查的修复。
flowchart LR
T[TODO] --> G{Graph}
G --> M1["Maker
(e.g. Claude Code)"]
G --> M2["Maker
(e.g. Codex)"]
M1 --> C1[Real checks]
M2 --> C2[Real checks]
C1 --> R1["Reviewer
(other lineage, e.g. Gemini)"]
C2 --> R2["Reviewer
(other lineage, e.g. Grok)"]
R1 -- REPAIR --> M1
R2 -- REPAIR --> M2
R1 -- ACCEPT --> D[Delivered]
R2 -- ACCEPT --> D
O[(Agent Office)] -.- G
K[(Knowledge Hub)] -.- G快速上手:立即使用这些技能
global/codex/skills/ 中的每个文件夹都是一项采用
SKILL.md 格式的技能。其中许多技能都是自包含的,可在任何加载技能文件夹的
客户端中运行。例如,在 Claude Code 中:
git clone https://github.com/PapeMati98/Ai-Stack.git
cp -r Ai-Stack/global/codex/skills/html-video ~/.claude/skills/适合独立入门的技能有:html-video、video-gen、voice-gen、
audio-bed-gen、operations-playbook、growth-experiments、
search-visibility、simulation-and-optimization。诸如
agent-graph、plan-delivery、model-council 和 clone-thread 这样的编排技能需要
Fleet、Agent Office 或 Knowledge Hub。部分技能说明以波兰语编写;
欢迎提供英文翻译(参见 CONTRIBUTING)。
完整技术栈(Fleet、Office、Hub)以 Windows 为首要平台,并且仅由一名操作员进行测试。 安装前请阅读入门指南。
包含哪些内容
AI Stack 将可复用技能、原生 CLI 执行、依赖调度器、持久化的智能体间协调、 共享项目知识和修复服务台结合起来。 其主要工作单元是一项简短的 TODO:执行者产出一项成果,随后进行实际检查, 再由来自另一模型家族的审查者接受该成果或要求针对性修复。 当任务存在真正的并行分支或依赖关系时,Graph 很有用; 小型任务则使用一对执行者/审查者。
此次发布不包含私有 Git 历史、操作员账户、转录记录、邮件、wiki 内容、 客户记录、运行时状态、模型权重和 CLI 二进制文件。源代码版本不会转让 任何人的订阅或访问权限。
组件
| 组件 | 来源 | 用途 |
|---|---|---|
| Native Fleet | fleet-suite/ | 提供商适配器、模型与模式验证、配额证据、固定版本部署与恢复 |
| Graph and common skills | global/codex/skills/ | TODO 执行、独立审查、历史上下文路由和可复用任务指导 |
| Agent Office | shared/agent-office/ | 状态感知、显式持久消息、交接与协调 |
| Knowledge Hub | shared/knowledge-hub/ | 基于信源的上下文、会话捕获和经审查的知识工作流 |
| RSI Helpdesk | global/codex/skills/rsi-helpdesk/ | 持久化事件登记和范围受限的修复执行 |
| Optional bridges | shared/ 和 global/tools/ | 具有独立前置条件的桌面端、浏览器、连接器和服务集成 |
| Release workbench | tools/release-workbench/ | 固定版本源代码导出、精确清单核验、隐私检查和溯源报告 |
可选连接器是源代码集成,并非克隆仓库即可启用的服务。 它们需要各自配置好的环境和权限。发布证据必须说明哪些组合确实通过了测试; 包含某个适配器并不能证明所有提供商或操作系统都经过测试。
安全启动
1. 阅读入门指南和 安全边界。 2. 运行离线合成演练。 它需要 Python 和 Git,不使用任何模型账户,也不会发起任何外部调用。 3. 在安装任何内容之前,检查全新 profile 的安装计划。 将显式指定的 profile 目录和状态目录与现有技术栈保持分离。 4. 仅配置你确实有权使用的原生提供商。 保留其数据使用、计费和模型身份检查。 运行原生合成演练,并保留实际执行和审查证据。
离线演练和原生演练属于不同类型的证据。二者均不构成安全认证、法律许可或发布授权。 24 个案例的离线参考和 验证状态分别说明各自的适用范围。
如何让交付成果可信
获接受的交付成果必须具备实际产物、可执行检查、原生执行身份和独立的产品评审。 仅凭消息发送成功、计划任务成功或进程退出并不足够。 失败情况和无法获得的测量结果应保持可见。 缓存的输入和推理内容不会再次计入提供商的总 token 数。
模型选择依据已配置的能力类别和当前证据。配额未知就是未知; 本地 token 账本不是账户余额 API。订阅或免费试用失败 并不意味着会回退到付费服务。
状态与许可
这是一个工程发布版本,而不是受支持的通用发布版本。
已完成检查和尚存缺口请参见
验证状态。仓库依据
Apache License 2.0 授权(另见 NOTICE)。
现有第三方声明仍随各自组件保留,并保持其各自的许可证,
例如 fleet-suite/payload/agent-fleet/scripts/vendor/typescript/
下内置的 TypeScript。
测试和示例中的客户端及项目名称均为虚构占位名称。
请勿将私有生产策略或资质审核记录复制到公开安装中。 配置你自己信任的策略,并证明你自己的提供商已准备就绪。 本仓库不包含任何模型账户、凭据、生产端点或访问授权。
译文由上游机器翻译生成,可能有误;判断请以英文原文为准。
英文原文(来源本站未改写)
AI Stack
One model builds. A different model reviews. Nothing ships on a single model's word.
A multi-model agent stack that runs the coding CLIs you already pay for — Claude Code, Codex, Gemini (Antigravity), Grok, Kimi, Qwen, Mistral, OpenCode, local models and more — as one team, with task graphs, 60+ skills, agent-to-agent messaging and shared memory.
   
From the team at Synaptivo.
Why it exists
Single-agent coding tools grade their own homework. AI Stack never does:
- Cross-lineage review by default. Every task is a maker/reviewer pair from different model families (for example Claude builds, Gemini or Grok reviews).A failed review triggers a targeted repair, not a rewrite. - Your subscriptions, not surprise API bills. The native Fleet drives the official CLIs headless with their own authentication, verifies which model actually answered, and never falls back to pay-as-you-go silently. - Task graphs for real parallel work. Small jobs use one pair;
larger jobs run as a dependency graph with independent reviewers per node. - Agents that talk to each other. Agent Office is a local, durable message bus with presence and handoffs between sessions of different tools. - Shared memory. Knowledge Hub is a source-grounded wiki every agent reads before work and records to after it. - A stack that reports its own bugs. RSI Helpdesk lets agents file defects in the stack itself and run bounded, reviewed repairs.
flowchart LR
T[TODO] --> G{Graph}
G --> M1["Maker
(e.g. Claude Code)"]
G --> M2["Maker
(e.g. Codex)"]
M1 --> C1[Real checks]
M2 --> C2[Real checks]
C1 --> R1["Reviewer
(other lineage, e.g. Gemini)"]
C2 --> R2["Reviewer
(other lineage, e.g. Grok)"]
R1 -- REPAIR --> M1
R2 -- REPAIR --> M2
R1 -- ACCEPT --> D[Delivered]
R2 -- ACCEPT --> D
O[(Agent Office)] -.- G
K[(Knowledge Hub)] -.- GQuick start: use the skills today
Each folder in global/codex/skills/ is a skill in the
SKILL.md format. Many are self-contained and work in any client that loads
skill folders. For example, with Claude Code:
git clone https://github.com/PapeMati98/Ai-Stack.git
cp -r Ai-Stack/global/codex/skills/html-video ~/.claude/skills/Good standalone starting points: html-video, video-gen, voice-gen,
audio-bed-gen, operations-playbook, growth-experiments,
search-visibility, simulation-and-optimization. Orchestration skills such as
agent-graph, plan-delivery, model-council and clone-thread need the Fleet,
Agent Office or Knowledge Hub. Some skill instructions are written in Polish;
English translations are welcome (see CONTRIBUTING).
The full stack (Fleet, Office, Hub) is Windows-first and tested by one operator. Read Getting started before installing it.
What's inside
AI Stack combines reusable skills, native CLI execution, a dependency scheduler, durable inter-agent coordination, shared project knowledge and a repair helpdesk. Its main unit of work is a short TODO: an executor produces an artifact, real checks run, and a reviewer from another model lineage accepts it or requests a targeted repair. A Graph is useful when tasks have real parallel branches or dependencies; a small task uses one maker/reviewer pair.
The release excludes private Git history, operator accounts, transcripts, mail, wiki contents, customer records, runtime state, model weights and CLI binaries. A source edition does not transfer anyone's subscription or access.
Components
| Component | Source | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Native Fleet | fleet-suite/ | Provider adapters, model and mode validation, quota evidence, pinned deployment and recovery |
| Graph and common skills | global/codex/skills/ | TODO execution, independent review, historical context routing and reusable task guidance |
| Agent Office | shared/agent-office/ | Presence, explicit durable messages, handoffs and coordination |
| Knowledge Hub | shared/knowledge-hub/ | Source-grounded context, session capture and reviewed knowledge workflows |
| RSI Helpdesk | global/codex/skills/rsi-helpdesk/ | Durable incident filing and bounded repair execution |
| Optional bridges | shared/ and global/tools/ | Desktop, browser, connector and service integrations with separate prerequisites |
| Release workbench | tools/release-workbench/ | Pinned source export, exact inventory verification, privacy checks and provenance reports |
Optional connectors are source integrations, not services enabled by cloning the repository. They require their own configured environment and permissions. The release evidence must state which combinations actually passed; inclusion of an adapter is not proof that all providers or operating systems were tested.
Start safely
1. Read Getting started and Security boundaries. 2. Run the offline synthetic walkthrough. It needs Python and Git, uses no model account and makes no external calls. 3. Inspect a fresh-profile installer plan before installing anything. Keep explicit profile and state directories separate from an existing stack. 4. Configure only the native providers you actually have permission to use. Preserve their data-use, billing and model identity checks. Run the synthetic native journey and retain its real execution and review evidence.
The offline walkthrough and native journey are different evidence. Neither one constitutes security certification, legal clearance or permission to publish. The 24-case offline reference and validation status describe their separate scope.
What makes a delivery credible
An accepted delivery has the actual artifact, executable checks, the native execution identity and an independent product review. A successful message, scheduled task or process exit alone is insufficient. Failures and unavailable measurements remain visible. Cached input and reasoning are not added again to a provider's total-token figure.
Model selection follows configured capability classes and current evidence. Unknown quota is unknown; a local token ledger is not an account-balance API. There is no paid fallback implied by a failed subscription or free trial.
Status and licensing
This is an engineering release, not a supported general release. See
Validation status for completed checks and
remaining gaps. The repository is licensed under the Apache License 2.0
(see also NOTICE). Existing third-party notices remain with their
components and keep their own licenses, for example the vendored TypeScript
under fleet-suite/payload/agent-fleet/scripts/vendor/typescript/.
Client and project names in tests and examples are fictional placeholders.
Do not copy private production policies or qualification receipts into a public installation. Configure your own trusted policy and prove your own provider readiness. No model account, credential, production endpoint or access grant is included in this repository.
这条还缺什么证据?
下面每条都由本条已有字段推出(等级、理由、商业模式、来源次数、是否演示), 本站不生成推测性结论;通用验证方法放在方法论页。
- 可核验的收入或付费证据查官网定价页与付费口径;第三方数据源(如 GetLatka)只作旁证,需标注来源与时点。
- 商业模式未定确认按席位/按用量/授权还是开源托管版收费;开源项目另查 LICENSE 与是否存在付费版。
- 只有单一来源找一手站点或其他渠道是否重复出现同一产品;社区热帖数量不等于商业进展。
通用验证清单(谁有这个问题/谁愿意付费/一个人能交付哪一小步)见我们的筛选方法。