Launch HN:Mireye(YC S26)——面向现实世界 AI 智能体的基础设施
Launch HN: Mireye (YC S26) – Infrastructure for Physical World AI Agents
我们发现了什么
Launch HN:Mireye(YC S26)——面向现实世界 AI 智能体的基础设施。我正在构建 AI 智能体用于对现实场所做出决策的基础设施:为美国任何地点提供数据、丰富信息、工具和信号,通过一个 API 和 MCP 服务器提供服务。
- 来源:Hacker News(发现于 2026-09-04)
- 证据等级:D · 发现产品或需求信号,暂未获得可核验的商业证据。
- 商业模式:API / Usage-based
- 主题:AI Agent
- 初筛评分:25.9/100 · 收录 1 次
证据,比故事更重要。
规则清洗与初筛,未经人工商业核验。原文语境、实际客户和付费情况仍需自行验证。
引用与数字披露
来源类型(原作者自述/第三方测算/媒体转引)需采集端标注,本版尚未落字段。
- 作者
- 未标注
- 抓取日期
- 来源类型
- 未标注
- 币种
- 未标注
- 口径
- 未标注
- 披露主体
- 未标注
- 披露日期
- 未标注
本条正文译文未完成(采集端 translation.body_ok=false),此处只展示英文原文。
英文原文(来源本站未改写)
Hi HN, I'm Ansh, founder of Mireye ( https://www.mireye.com ).I'm building the infrastructure AI agents use to make decisions about physical places: data, enrichment, tools, and signals for any US location, behind one API and MCP server.Here's a demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haqO6UbUqU0 To try it, paste https://www.mireye.com/skills.md into your agent, and grab a free key at mireye.com (5,000 credits, no card).Docs are at https://docs.mireye.ai .The fastest way in is to ask the API any question about any US location.Test it on a place you know, cold and grade it against what you know.
Before Mireye I was building construction agents and hit this wall myself: my agent could reason about anything online but knew nothing about the ground under it.Then a Fortune 500 insurer told me their engineers had given up on underwriting agents for the same reason.Frontier models keep hallucinating when asked a specific question about a specific place.My first product was a niche site-screening app.Customers tested it on places they knew and the answers held up, but nobody cared about the app.They wanted the engine underneath.Usage agreed: 311 of the 317 fields in the catalog get queried and no use case dominates.So I killed the app and started building the infrastructure instead.
Mireye is not a dataset with an API on top, because facts alone are not a decision.An agent runs the whole job through it: cited facts, a bare address enriched into owner, acreage, structures, and nearby power, tools for the operations models get wrong, and signals when something changes, like a rezoning filing.Data, enrichment, tools, signals.The tools came from watching agents fail.We build agents on our own infra, and the same things kept breaking: an agent would eyeball a distance instead of computing it, grab the wrong parcel for an address, or burn its whole budget halfway through a batch.
Each failure became something an agent can call: deterministic geometry and drive-time tools, parcel resolution, a quote endpoint that prices a job before it runs, and skills that package whole workflows like screening a site or underwriting an address.The hard part surprised me.Every source has to be gathered (sometimes county by county, in whatever format each county publishes), normalized into one schema, contracted (where it comes from, what each value means, how often it refreshes), and then kept fresh forever.We run that loop for 366 fields today, served multi-tenant from one index, and every source fought back differently.
Maryland publishes a dataset literally titled "Hidden Property Owner Names." I filed public records requests in North Carolina because nobody indexes sewer mains.The deeper problem is meaning.Two counties publish a field with the same name and it means different things.And the most dangerous value is null.Does it mean "no flood zone here" or "this county never mapped floods"?Put a model in front of that gap and it fills the silence
这条还缺什么证据?
下面每条都由本条已有字段推出(等级、理由、商业模式、来源次数、是否演示), 本站不生成推测性结论;通用验证方法放在方法论页。
- 可核验的收入或付费证据查官网定价页与付费口径;第三方数据源(如 GetLatka)只作旁证,需标注来源与时点。
- 只有单一来源找一手站点或其他渠道是否重复出现同一产品;社区热帖数量不等于商业进展。
通用验证清单(谁有这个问题/谁愿意付费/一个人能交付哪一小步)见我们的筛选方法。